Skip to content
SF-2026-000652UnverifiedDeep State & Intel Agencies

Letter on Valeriy Vladimirovich Kostikov and Oswald (10 May 1982)

This document is a single-page 'Service to Service' intelligence letter dated 10 May 1982, apparently addressed within a Western intelligence liaison channel (referencing CIA official David Blee). The letter focuses on Valeriy Vladimirovich Kostikov, born 17 March 1933 in Moscow, an identified KGB officer who served in Mexico City from 1961–71 and was posted to Beirut in 1978 as 1st Secretary. The author cites BARRON's 'KGB' (page 307) suggesting Kostikov may have belonged to Department V, and notes EPSTEIN's 'Legend' which claims a CIA telecheck identified Kostikov as Lee Harvey Oswald's KGB case officer in Mexico City. It notes that per BARRON (page 335) Oswald was in Mexico between September and November 1963 seeking a Soviet visa, and that NOSENKO characterized the KGB interest in Oswald as defensive. The letter's operational purpose is current: the writer explains that the Beirut embassy has faced threats and violence, and seeks the recipient's views on whether the KGB (possibly via the Syrians) is behind recent incidents, whether Kostikov is still in Beirut, and any Active Measures roles among personnel in Beirut or Damascus. The record was released by NARA on 18 March 2025 as part of the 2025 JFK assassination records release.

Source: JFK Assassination Records - 2025 Documents Releasearchives.govIncident May 10, 1982Released Mar 18, 2025Discovered Jul 4, 202637.7 KBdocument
sha256:ade8972b4524b639770e

Description

A one-page intelligence liaison letter dated 10 May 1982 concerning Valeriy Vladimirovich Kostikov, an identified KGB officer, discussing his history in Mexico City and posting to Beirut, his alleged link to Lee Harvey Oswald, and requesting assessment of possible KGB involvement in violence against the Beirut embassy. Released by the U.S. National Archives on 18 March 2025 under the President John F. Kennedy Assassination Records Act of 1992.

Claims

  • Kostikov was an identified KGB officer who served in Mexico City from 1961–71 and was posted to Beirut in 1978 as 1st Secretary.

    70%
  • EPSTEIN's 'Legend' claims a CIA telecheck identified Kostikov as Lee Harvey Oswald's KGB case officer in Mexico City.

    60%
  • BARRON's 'KGB' suggests Kostikov may have been in Department V.

    55%
  • According to NOSENKO, the KGB interest in Oswald was defensive.

    55%
  • The Beirut embassy had been subject to threats and violence, prompting review of KGB staff possibly involved.

    60%

Events

  1. May 9, 1982

    Letter drafted concerning Kostikov

    Intelligence liaison letter written requesting assessment of Kostikov and possible KGB activity in Beirut.

  2. May 5, 1982

    Referenced prior conversation

    A conversation of 6 May referenced in the letter.

  3. Dec 31, 1962

    Oswald in Mexico City

    Per BARRON, Oswald was in Mexico between September and November 1963 seeking a Soviet visa.

  4. Mar 17, 2025

    NARA 2025 release

    Document released by the National Archives under the JFK Records Act.

Dates mentioned

1982-05-101982-05-061933-03-171961197119781963

Keywords

Entities

Extracted text (OCR)
1704-10012-10024

ao.

L

| 2025 RELEASE UNDER THE PRESIDENT JOHN F. KENNEDY ASSASSINATION RECORDS ACT OF 1992

® r f ‘ ‘ ux Os a PS Pe

6/705

10 May 1982

Dear Wass “. S

VALERIY VLADIMIROVICH KOSTIKOV— .

1. Please refer to our conversation of 6 May. KOSTIKOV, born 17 March
1933, Moscow, was posted to Beirut in 1978 as lst Secretary and may still
be there. He is identified KGB and served in Mexico City from 1961-71.
There is a reference to him on page 307 of BARRON's KGB which suggests
that he may have been Department V. We do not appear to have asked LYALIN
about him, and are now doing so.

2. We also note that EPSTEIN in "Legend" claims that according to a CIA
telecheck KOSTIKOV was Lee Harvey OSWALD's KGB case officer in Mexico City.
According to BARRON (page 335) OSWALD was in Mexico between September and
November 1963 and was seeking to obtain a Soviet visa. There was certainly
a KGB interest in OSWALD, although according to NOSENKO this was defensive.

3. The reason for our current interest in KOSTIKOV will be obvious. As
you are aware, our Embassy in Beirut, in common with other Western Missions,
has been subject ® threats and violence in recent months, and in view of
earlier hostile attentions from the KGB, we have been reviewing our records

of KGB staff in the area who might have been involved in promoting strong-arm
tactics.

4, We would be grateful for your views as to whether the KGB are likely to
be behind any of the recent incidents (possibly through the Syrians) and for
any information on KOSTIKOV and his activities in Mexico and in Beirut. In
particular, what are your comments on the OSWALD story; can you confirm that
KOSTIKOV is still in Beirut; is there anyone else in Beirut or Damascus whose

‘trace record suggests an Active Measures role, or worse?

Oho

5. We should be grateful for an early reply and as I said on 6 May will treat
anything you can tell us on a strictly Service to Service basis.

cross Re oe Yours ever
201-5 ms

foO< ge a
pO NOT DESTROY

A "AN LAL dary Form 547a Procs ssed |

par TZ of Soo rf e _' AC M de Vere XA . O72 /S

pe

rT ha? a TAY A “) TT noon rom - PLO Dey Ss

on — 3 ee ee fore we £.
r David Blee | bot 2g Or

a

Related files

Connected through the network