DOW-UAP-D095, Joint U.S.-Canadian Aviation Projects and UFO Sighting Reports, 1954-1955
This file assembles U.S. Air Force and joint U.S.-Canadian materials from 1954-1955 on developmental VTOL aircraft and associated UFO reporting. A central component is the Scientific Advisory Board's report (dated November/December 1954, forwarded with J.H. Doolittle's approval) on the Avro Project Y2, a joint U.S.-Canadian near-circular VTOL aircraft developed by A.V. Roe Canada Ltd. of Malton, Ontario. The SAB expressed generally negative findings on technical feasibility, contrasting with an optimistic article, 'The Flying Disc,' published in the December 1954 issue of the Air Intelligence Digest. A 1954 memorandum notes that circular-planform VTOL aircraft could be mistaken for UFOs by unfamiliar observers, and recommends re-examining UFO reports near Soviet operations for possible attribution to advanced foreign VTOL designs. The file also documents a UFO incident in which a USAF KC-97 tanker crew reported sighting an unidentified object over the Newfoundland area (approx. 49N 59.5W) on 6 July 1955, coinciding with a GCI ground radar return. An AFOIN-2C committee reviewed crew interrogations and the Northeast Air Command (NEAC) evaluation, concluded no intelligence supported the existence of comparable unconventional Soviet aircraft, and stated it was 'unable to explain the simultaneous ground radar returns and aircrew visual sightings.' The committee classified the incident as UFOB, tentatively accepting the NEAC attribution to electrical phenomena and aircrew misinterpretation, and recommended future fighter scrambles without delay. Additional correspondence addresses the potential intelligence value of incidental radar collection of meteors (with a recommendation to improve the AN/FPS-17 radar) and expresses support for the Communications Instructions for Reporting Vital Intelligence Sightings (CIRVIS) program, a joint U.S.-Canadian civil-military airborne/maritime hazard reporting effort administered in part by Hq MATS.
Description
A 57-page declassified U.S. Air Force compilation of reports, memoranda, and correspondence concerning developmental vertical take-off and landing (VTOL) aircraft — notably the Avro Project Y2 near-circular 'flying saucer' aircraft — along with a July 1955 KC-97 UFO incident near Newfoundland, radar collection of meteors, and support for the CIRVIS reporting program. Released by the U.S. Department of War as part of its 2026 UAP records release (Release 4).
Claims
The USAF Scientific Advisory Board found the Avro Project Y2 warranted only limited support due to generally negative technical feasibility findings.
90%A USAF committee found the July 1955 KC-97 Newfoundland incident inconsistent with known Soviet, American, or Canadian military systems and was unable to explain the simultaneous ground radar returns and aircrew visual sightings.
90%The USAF Scientific Advisory Board found the Avro Project Y2 warranted no more than limited support and reached generally negative findings on its technical feasibility.
90%An AFOIN-2C committee was unable to explain the simultaneous ground radar returns and aircrew visual sightings in the July 1955 Newfoundland KC-97 incident and classified it as UFOB.
90%A 1954 memorandum opined that VTOL aircraft with a circular planform may be mistaken for UFOs by observers unfamiliar with such technologies.
85%The committee classified the Newfoundland incident as UFOB and tentatively attributed it to electrical phenomena and aircrew misinterpretation.
85%A 1954 memorandum opines that circular-planform VTOL aircraft may be mistaken for UFOs by observers unfamiliar with such technology, and recommends re-examining UFO reports near Soviet military assets as possible foreign advanced aircraft.
85%The committee found no intelligence available to support or deny the existence of unconventional Soviet aircraft of the reported performance.
85%The memorandum recommended re-examining UFO reports near Soviet military operations to assess whether they might be advanced foreign VTOL aircraft.
80%ARDC recommended using incidental radar collection of meteors entering the atmosphere to improve the AN/FPS-17 radar system.
80%USAF Air Research and Development Command recommended using incidental radar collection of meteor data to improve the AN/FPS-17 radar system.
75%USAF policy on UFOs was directed at 'debunking, minimizing, and playing down' reports while excluding classified vehicles such as ATIC projects, per a January 1955 memorandum.
70%
Events
Nov 2, 1955
CIRVIS program commendation memorandum
Memorandum for the record supporting the CIRVIS program and MATS' indoctrination efforts.
Sep 27, 1954
SAB panels briefed on Avro 'Saucer' project at Omaha
Aircraft and Propulsion Panels briefed by Hq ARDC representatives at the Fall meeting of the Board in Omaha.
Dec 9, 1954
SAB report on Avro Project Y2 forwarded to Lt. Gen. Putt
J.H. Doolittle forwarded the Scientific Advisory Board's report with generally negative feasibility findings.
Jul 5, 1955
KC-97 Newfoundland UFO sighting
KC-97 tanker crew reported an unidentified object near Newfoundland (approx. 49N 59.5W) coinciding with a GCI ground radar return.
Jul 7, 1955
AFOIN-2C committee tasked to evaluate incident
OIN-2C directed its committee to evaluate the 6 July KC-97 sightings and GCI radar returns.
Sep 27, 1954
SAB panels briefed on Avro 'Saucer' project
Aircraft and Propulsion Panels briefed by Hq. ARDC representatives at the Board's Fall meeting in Omaha.
Dec 9, 1954
Scientific Advisory Board report on Avro Project Y2 forwarded
Doolittle forwards the SAB's completed study with generally negative technical feasibility findings to Lt. Gen. Putt.
Jul 5, 1955
KC-97 Newfoundland UFO incident
A USAF KC-97 crew near Newfoundland reported an unidentified object with a simultaneous GCI ground radar return.
Jul 10, 1955
AFOIN-2C committee evaluation of Newfoundland incident
Committee concluded the incident should be classified as UFOB and could not explain the simultaneous radar and visual observations.
Jul 9, 2026
File release
Department of War released the file in the 2026 UAP disclosure series (release 4).
Dates mentioned
Keywords
Entities
Organizations
People
Programs
Extracted text (OCR)
Authority:
NND 974373
,
f
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE
Head.quarters United States Air Force
Washington 25 1 D. C.
SCIENTIFIC ADVISORY BOARD TO THE CHIEF OF STAFF, tJSAF'
scn;NrIFIC ADVISORY BOARD :REPORT ON AVRO PROJECT Y2
~
Novembex· 1951+
----------:"
This document consists of ______ pages
Copy Number~-- of _,l.1,, ··- copies.
0
ECRB±'
.
....
,
DEPARTMENT OF TBE AIR FORCE
t
Head.quarters United States Air Foree
Washington 25, D. C.
10 December 1954
Lieutenant General Donald I.. Pu·tt
Deputy Chi et of Staff, Development
Headquarters United States Air Force
Washington, D. C..
Dear Don:
In response to your request tor BAB commen·t,s on the Avco
"Saucer'' project, the SAB baa taken the following action:
The Aircraft and Propulsion Panels were brieted on September
28 ·by represente.tivea ot Bq. ARDC, at ·the time of the Fall meet~j.ng
of the Board in Omaha. The tentat:ive conclusions ot bo·tb panels
immediately atter this briefing were to the ettect that th.is pro.Ject warranted no more than limited support. l!oveve:r, to assu1·e
·thoro\lgb. consideration ot this project, I requested rt:?presentatives
of these two panels to supplement. the briefings given 'to -them at
~ by a. Tisi·t to A. V. Roe- Canada Ltd., Malton., Ontario.
With the advice of Clark Millikan and Dean Soderberg., a select
committee ,ms choaen to conclude this study. It was c~sed ot
Dean Soderberg, Chairman of the Propulsion Panel and senior member
o'f the group; Professor Markham, of the Aircraft Panel; and Mr .
Donovan, who has been serving both as a member or 'the Aircraft Panel
and as lie..:I.son member with the Propulsi,on Panel.
The attached report ot this ,group is ~orwarded with my «.PPt•oval,
representing the results ot the SAB's ccapleted study.
Sincerely,
/a/
J. H. DOOLr.rTLE
Actins Chairman
Scient.itic Advisory Board
Office ot the Chief of Sta.ff
Inclosure
•
-
S E C Ft B 'f
..
We h&Te preaate4 to 7011 ao■e eT14ao• Uult fl7fac aaw,era ai-e w:lthia
the oapa'bili\iea of \he exiatinc •au.te •f Ille ar\ 1 in thia oeunv7 ad
0uad&. !he ••tat• of \he art• ia well boa in ~opeaa ceU11tri••• !he
a.au.a effeo\ baa \••• bon to all oou.triea aad ~• &PJ)lica,1oa ta ut
be70n4 ill• oapa'bili\iea of th• Sevieta. It 1• poaaibl.e ta&\ hnan projeota
tor flT,lq •ucea ena\ed at th• •a4 of tile var. 91.e au 00•114.ered
P•••i'bl• tei>• la thia field ia auppoaecl to b• 1a ~ u.a. aov. W• haYe
repor\a •• •P
vit•••••• ot tl71ac aauea ia 8oTie\ \err1'9r7.
Ult.I
~1»11'211
1. !he eatlr• 1•-•lligen.oe oe1111W1l,7 be alerte4 to a poaalbl• SoT1et
aotivit7 h 11>.11 fiel4.
a.
All exiatinc tt.1•• oa toreip tl.Jiac·aauoera ahoul.4 \e reT1ewe4
u4 anal7se4.
1. llrm Ba\eicah llhoul4 'be iaterropted '7 iatelllc•aoe aaalyata
11ho haTe a full baolr.gr.ad •• ex1a,1ac 1a,e111ceaoe.
,. le\•r• Kie\he llhould be feud. Poaail>l7 Kietae OM.14 1l&Ye uuce4
hi• name k llruao Jer'beioh er aoae • tiler al.iaa.
s• .A. oolleotloa reca.uiN•nt aheul.l be plaeed. ea all aceoi•• ia the
field. i:D.Olu41q the .A.itach•••
SECRET
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE
HEADQUARTBM UNITED STATES AIR P'ORCIE
WASHIN<aTON &I. D. C.
JAN 131955
-
POI IIIIIAL UWOD
81IBJJIC!lt
Anicle "91e J'qi. . Diao• ill DeCIIDW I • - of-. Air
Iatellipae• lt:l.·•t
1. 111r1J1a tM latter ,-n ot ...,.._er I wu annached. _,
Jll.1or Boated. u4 uud fer a ..., auaar:, or atataat flt peai't1•
oa UPO' ■, pnt.-..q cluaitie&, 'for ue 1a '1w Air Iatellipaoe
wne
Dipat ia ooamectica Yi'tll . . &niel.• OD.. rnelJl.tioury of aircraft. I atatei. oar }'Olit.1• reprtiq IJO'• &al Uliea\N.
-U.t wr beat etton■ 1• '111• ti•l.4 wre coutaa1.ly tirecte4 'to
li■ ccvacillC, ld.aia:lsiaa, u4 Jl.ayiJaa 4on. Ul1' ... all &\tellpta
a\ ,ulioi'Q', an uclwliDC cluaitied Tebiclea a11Cla u AID.
2. Ma..1or Boaton &coepte4 "111• atataen, iaticat1111 tat
the artiele oa ta...,. aircraft 1NNl.t. lte ,ultliallei. withod . _
•GIIJMlmoa piece • WO'• _. nae•tea "1».t I gl.aaoe a, 'tile tiu.1.
tran.
3. I r-4 the tia&l iraft u4 aiaoe I Ml not l>ea ·pnm.~
ltrietel. an 1-111•
ect I ...,.r1.a IIIJor -..tor,. nprt1ac aom
Be re.,lie4 in tu attimatift Ml
iatiea'W. \Mt we wre oa aolil pva4 em "11&, 'tbe »reJect lliernefore .... - · - llad1e4 Tery CircnlllQeCi;q. .,. tiul. ·-•Uoa ,,..
to el.1aillate the lut paracraph ~ the article witll a 1ll'O i1e-1a,
vtaicll vu prolNlltly cmarloek.e4 lteton ~lica\1011..
Ul4 Air fiatt
.•1;1oa.
•• liaoe the reoeipt ot "1le aaoru4a trca the :lan.\i'ft
Seere\&ry at tile 8ciertitic .lbiaory Join. (!alt A), . , iawa\ipUeu
M f t revealed. '1ae tollowiq:
a.
.. toll.on:
!lie eneat ot coonliu.Uoa Oil the article ia AD waa
)Ir.~
Irr Jl&o--
- 2Cl.
- 2C1
Lt Colonel Pvrior - 2Cl
Celoul Zoller
Jlr. C11lllor•
ColOIIMll. Mw
••
- 2C
- 21
- 2l
)Ir. hlJJa vu lllller u. erroaeou illprueiea that tu
proJen 1IIM1. -..... fa'YOl'Uly cQU1UN4 lo" tu Air coaeil. aD4 ao
a4'Yiae4 JltJor »>atod.
e. eol.eul 1. •• VnQ-, m.tet ot tbe ~ i c a l Xnaioa,
..a
Diree\orate o'f Jleae&Nll
D ~ t . , &bi••• tlaat ,u pruen-t
••• Gt tM :pro.)ect w1'111a BCIJ/JJ ia u tollwa:
✓
SECRET
DEPARTMENT .OF THE AIR FORCE
HEADQUARTERS UNITE£) STATES AIR··FORCE
WASHINGTON 25. D. C.
14 December 1954
MIIDWIDUM JOI. DIBl&TCll 07 IIDLLIGDCI, DOIi
SUBJJCT:
Scientitio Advisor, Board bport on .A.VIO •n11nc Saucer"
Project.
1. J.ttached tor yora: intonation. ia a cow of a recent nport of the Scientitic Mriaor, Board on their atud7 ot the •t17ing aaw»r• project ot .A.. v. aoe, Cu.ad&.
2. Your attention ia particul.arl.7 iDTited to ta. generally
negative tiDdiDga vit.b reprd to technical feasibility expreaaed
1D thia report, in contrut to~ pnenJ. 1.lqateaeion ot technical aouadDeaa ad optiJliatic expectation.a COllff,-d in the article.
on "The Pl1ing Diec• publiahed in the Decaber, 1954, iasue ot
1ihe .l1r Intelligence Dipat.
3. Thia report vu eul:aitted to Lt. Gen. D. L. Putt on
10 Deouber in reaponae to hie pretlou reqU11at tor SlB oaamta.
-,,,
Incloaure
l . .lvro rpt, 07 2
.'
CBIS!II I. IWDT
._cutiw Secretary
lcien.titic .Adrlaor, Board
- ottice ot 'tM Ohief ot Statt
A
-.•
-
•
.
••••
.................
.......................
.......
.:r,1,.
......
...... ....
...... ..-. .......
.........
, .....
............................
~
.
la
....
••
'
.
·,
,,
,
'\
'
''•
,,
"
'
,
'
.
.
•
•'•
IV.. UI
•
•
.•
·~
. . . . . . . .1JN\
•.·. •
•
II
COYER$
•·
SUSPENSE
OIIIIIII a,
DATE
AIIISICiiNED ..,
.,.
-..:r
( Un.cl)
Memorandua for Record
Iniiial " l N " column t o denote review prior t o action.
action; ; for coordination.)
I n i t i a l "OUT~'
column t o d e n o t e review of completed action.
---,----
IN
OUT
{X for
OFFICE
OFFICE
Olll-2X
OIN-Xl
OfN•lU
Sit ARMY OFF
18:
o.\TI
....
2 5 JUL 1955
AJOD-X
C:OMlfENT NO.
.Af0Df-2X
C0IIMIIITI (U. ...... ~-·•,,,.)
1Porwar4ec1. ror your approval and signature.
c.
Colonel, USAF
Directorate of Intelligenoe
2 Incl•
n./o
d,...)
inal{s) Bo. ---·--"·-
---------
/ar• •1)ed1:am (or not ~tt~obt4},
- - - - - - ~ - - - - - cl:lSSL. icatlOD
this Co ...,... et"!•..,c·., .. ,.,11 ... e uill b, down.ed to
!~"'-"~
-·---- ln
cordance with Par
• A1B 20&-1.
~....
'.;.)k-'
..........,.,,,,
AFHQ "~: 53 0-86
;
PR!YIOUI EDITIONS OF THIS FORII
COVER
..
ORIGIN OF
SUSPENSE
SIC
ASS l&NED BY
TE
12 Ju 55
SUBJECT
lleaonm4111. for Beeonl
ROUTIIQ
prior to act ioi.. bi tial "OOT• column to det.ote re..-iev of C<npleted
1 :
.aoD-2
P'RON:
DOil-20
Att&oMt. 1a an Air Statt 8wr7 Suet oGIIIIPlY1Jac nth paragrapll 2.a. of CWu
2.
2·Incla
Incl 1
MM~-1 Incl
.... ueet
2 1u1a
VIRGIL L. ZOLLER
Colon.el, USAJ
Directorate of Inte1111..,.
-
. .i..... t•) ...
.. ....,.
.1~
••
"°'
...,
......
..
ilasalf!catlon ot thia -
...........
o r _ _ . \e
0-88
'EltVfOUS EDfTIONJ 0, Tttt• J'eRM W.Y K
USED,
SUSPENSE
at 161H OF &AS IC
DATE
0IN-2Cl~
D IY
TE
TYPE
SUBJECT
Memorandum. for Record
ROUTING
r to &ctioa. Initial "OUT" column to deuote reTiew of completed
T :
AFOIN-2
f'ltOM:
AFOIN-2C
Col. Ma.cDuff
COMi£NTS(
!Ot
15 JlllJ' 1,,,
AJOD-2C
l
AftD-lt'
COl.
e-..•.a
1. A con ot ~ •'"aebM.
te .UOD•ll ..._ .UOD-2.A..
1.
tt ia teaint tbat yow. tau the.tollolt1.nc two ~iou;
it.
•· PrQue a letter to t1ae »cs ,eJ=-tina, r.r .....-.i SUrtor4'• a1patve,
GOat&iaiJla the i-ec-alat1ca o f ~ 9 o f ~ :a.
'b. Prepare a ,-er for :rel-• to the BCD coataill1Jlc the 1.afort111.t1•
1:aclde4 iJl ~ 1 ~ 6 ~ ,-r
. '!Ilia pqer alllul4 -• cocml1u.te4
tbnq'b .DGD-2 prior to rel-•.
l Illcl
~b7
4M ll .r.l 55
FCRM
AFHQ tt JUL 94 0-88
.E. SCHIIIDD
·.·•·~:,~
Colonel, US.A.1'
Directorate ot Intellia•DO•
. ,£Rvtous u1n0Ns o, THtl '°""' MAY H usro.
7
.,
,.
.; ,'
•
,.
*
.AFOIN-2C4
'
Col. MacDuff /bps/524-66
w/11 July 1955
MEMORANDtM FOR RECORD
PROBUM:
.. .... --
1.
To evaluate Kc 97 crew sightings and ground radar returns of object in
the Newf'o,mdland.. area ( 491
5950W) .
FACTS
DISCUSSION:
--···AND.... ·----. ..... 2.
OIN-2C directed ·the OIN-2C cotmllJ.ttee 011 8 July to evaluate the 6 July
Kc 97 sightings and GCI radar returns over Newfound.land as summarized and detailed
inCAF IN 15592, dtd 6 JuJ.y 55 and CAF IN 90703 dtd 7 July 55.
3. In arriving at the following conclusions the conmittee reviewed reports
summarizing the incident, the crew interrogations and the NEAD evaluation of
the j_nc1.dent. In addition certain new U.S. and Canadian developments in high
performance unconventional aircraft were considered.
CONCLUSIONS:
4.
It was concluded that no intelligence is available to support or deny
the existence of unconventional Soviet aircraft comparable to those un.der
consideration in the US and Canada and provid1.ng performance such as reported.
5. The committee was unable to explain the simultaneous ground radar
returns and aircrew visual sightings, and tentatively accepts the NEAC evaluation
attributing the :i.ncident to electrical phenomenon on the one hand and misinterpretation of -the s:i.ghtings by aircrew members on the other.
6.
It was further concluded that this inc:f.dent should be classified as UFOB.
7. This i ten1 is not consj_dered suitable for inclusion in D/I Policy Book
or the Daily Staff Di. gest.
RECCMOOIDATIONS:
.......
8. Due to the serious technological threat should tmfriendly nations succeed
in developing high performance unconventional ai.rcraft increased effort should
be made by all collec·tion agencies to penetrate the Soviet Research and Development
establishments a.nd programs in order to give the U.S. adequate warning of any
developments in this area.
9. It is further recommended that in the event of future incidents of this
nature fighter scrambles be effected without delay.
COORDINATION:
....... i···• ■
•·
I ■■
■
-■ U
AFOIN-2C4, Col. MacDuff, ext. 52
AFOIN•-2Cl, Lt. Col. Farrior, ext.
AFOIN-2C2, CoJ.. Gould, ext. 56200
AFOIN-205, Col. OWynne,,ext. 55538
'
DEPARTMEN
A.F RQ- 50 fl!."' 21 June 48)
44►
Hf}I
...., '
10-5
I
OFFICE OF PREPARATION
TO
.UOil-204
TEL.
- - - - , - - - - - - - - - + - - - - - + - - - - - - - - « - - - - - - - ' I GRADE - SURNAME
52466
Col Whitaain/t>PS
SUMMARY
l. On 6 July the cm ot a l'.C-97 taker ~rtecl the aigb:tillg ot an Wli4entifie4
e'b.1ect 1n the l'elffnndlaa4 aNt& 1
) • At the tiae ot the aightiq a
CICI raclar in the aaae ar-. obtaiaed a raclar r • ~ o~,aa !b.1ect vllich apparently,,..
14-'tical to 1:he one the KC-97 crew ba4 Dier viaual obeenation. A CQllllittee, appoiatec1.
by tbia Directorate t. eV&l:ct&te this sighting reviewed r-.,orta n111~:riz1Dg the inciclent
by the Bortlleaat Air CCIIIIM4.
!he e-:1 ttee ten:tativel.1' attribute4 the sighting to
electrical ph-.eacm and visual Jliainte17retaticm by aircrew J1811ltera. . At the auae tiae,
honver, the P--~ttee 41acuee4 the poaaibility that the object might have been an
hip pertomu.ce 'IUlCODva.ticmal aircraft. !bi• Directorate is or the op1Jlien that tbe
clevelopaent of such an aircraft by u untri~_nation woucl. conetitute a aeriou
teolmelopcal threat to the Uaited states, and therefore eve-ry ettort mat be aa4e to
14eatity ·aightiaga 1n the tature. ..
In ita cliacuaaioa of aethecla to be uaed to obta:f.B 1i.ent11'1catien or objects
aighte41a a similar fashion ill th.e tuture, the CGIIM:Jttee eoael114ecl that the aetho4
po•••••iD& the ••t l1ke.l.ihoe4 of su.ceeaa YWl4 1-e interceptio ot the ob.1ect by tia;b.ter
'tile •~t •t :tat.are incicleJlta ot.thia natve fighters
2.
ulq.
,
,
•. ••
•••ace
. .• . 3•. Atta.cul u !ab A ia a JropNe4
to the ee.uMr IIACCII, tirectiBg • •
• aCJ:'lllllJi. ot
llaJra aa reecaanua 1t7 tu Nll■i ttee.
•
•
DCCIIIIIDA.TIOJI
It.. Sipature of attached •aaage.
FRANK B. CHAPPELL
Colonel USAF
Directorate ot Intelligex1ce
l Incl
••a
to
C4r DAC
PrQoae4
~1703
I
00
11579
-
..
,.
.....,_
....
.................... .........
.....,
...
.......
,
,.
- ,lllllt, ---;~ •
,
.
11U111tt1111•
.
•;'
.
.
,,
•'
-
'
,. . . . .
. . .
.
•.
',,t·
: •• .....
......... ...
..
,
.
,r
IIBIIORANDt111 FOR THE RECORD
SUBJECT:
NOV
3 1955
CIBVIS Program
1. In accordance with AFR 200-3, Bq KATS, is responsible
for contacting commercial airlines and pilots to indoctrinate
them and secure their participation in the CIRVIS program as
outlined in the JAMAP 146 series.
2.
Intelligence Division, Rq JIATS, has done an outstanding job in this indoctrination, having contacted coJD.ercial
airlines, the National Business Aircraft Association, and the
pilots in both. They have secured the cooperation of all
coapanies and associations through writing a multitude of
letters. They have gone into the field and personally lectured
to regional pilots' meetings and have succeeded in getting a
real interest in CIRVIS aroused for the first tiae. This has
been a treaendous task a.nd has only been accomplished by an'
exceptional effort. However, the only way to keep the interest
at a peak is to keep. eaphasizing the illlportance of the CIRVIS
program to them.. MATS' efforts aust continue.
3. Al'OIK-lA-P, wherein lies the responsibility for 11.onitoring the CIRVIS program. for APOIN, and in part for Hq USAF,
has long felt that JIATS should be compliaented in writing on
their fine job, and ~t the same tiae be urged to continue their
prograa. It is felt that any letter of recognition or
comaendation should COJl.e originally from CINCON.AD and an inforaal suggestion has been made along these lines.
4. However, this seeas like a good opportunity for
us to easily and naturally show our awareness of and satisfaction for a job well done. Hence, the forwarding of the
correspondence from ADC by the letter indicating our appreciation.· It is felt that we should take this chance to help
the• continue the good work.
Related files
Connected through the network
SF-2026-001284
