Skip to content
SF-2026-000786UnverifiedDeep State & Intel Agencies

1953 CIA Correspondence from Physics and Electronics Division on Current Status of UFOB Project

This CIA office memorandum, dated 31 March 1953 and authored by C. Durant for addressee P.G. Strenz, addresses the administrative handling of Unidentified Flying Object (UFO) reports within the Agency. It notes that Jack Heckert relayed that the Office of Current Intelligence (O/CI) is no longer following UFO reports and holds the O/CI file of UFO dispatches, seeking guidance on where to send it. The memo states that Office of Scientific Intelligence (O/SI) interest in UFOs is centered on Dave (David S.) Stevenson of the Applied Science Division, backstopped by Lt. Col. Fritz Oder of the Geophysics Division. Durant recommends O/SI keep watch on UFO reports in anticipation of possibly greater activity during the coming summer, and proposes concrete steps: designating the Chief of the Applied Science Division as coordinator of UFO reports with David S. Stevenson as 'action man'; requesting O/CI transfer files currently in John Heckert's custody to Stevenson (retaining only indicative or unusual samples and destroying the rest); and routing O/CI Screening Panel messages on UFOs (via Miss Lowry) to Stevenson. The memo characterizes this as the simplest means of keeping tabs on the subject with minimal effort, valuable in the event of a future 'flap,' and offers to prepare directive memos if approved. Distribution copies were listed for the addressee, subject file, chrono file, and daily reading file. The document is part of the CIA's UFO-related records held in its FOIA Reading Room.

cia.govIncident Mar 31, 1953Discovered Jul 4, 2026161.8 KBdocument
sha256:026b1b219c717f08df1e

Description

A three-page CIA internal office memorandum dated 31 March 1953 from C. Durant to P.G. Strenz proposing how the Office of Scientific Intelligence (O/SI) should assign responsibility for monitoring UFO reports after the Office of Current Intelligence (O/CI) ceased tracking them. Released via the CIA FOIA Reading Room.

Claims

  • The memo recommends that most of the transferred UFO files be destroyed, retaining only indicative or unusual reports as samples.

    80%
  • The Office of Current Intelligence (O/CI) is no longer following UFO reports and holds a file of UFO dispatches.

    75%
  • O/SI interest in UFOs is centered on David S. Stevenson, backstopped by Lt. Col. Fritz Oder.

    75%
  • The Office of Current Intelligence (O/CI) is no longer following up on reports of Unidentified Flying Objects as of March 1953.

    75%
  • O/SI interest in UFOs is centered on David S. Stevenson of the Air Branch/Applied Science Division.

    75%
  • Durant recommends that most of the transferred UFO files be destroyed, retaining only indicative or unusual reports as samples.

    75%
  • Greater UFO activity was anticipated during the coming summer of 1953.

    70%
  • Greater UFO activity was anticipated in the summer of 1953.

    60%

Events

  1. Mar 30, 1953

    Durant memorandum on UFO report handling

    C. Durant proposes assigning O/SI responsibility for monitoring UFO reports after O/CI ceased tracking them.

  2. Mar 30, 1953

    Memorandum on handling of UFO reports

    C. Durant proposes O/SI assume responsibility for monitoring UFO reports after O/CI ceased following them.

Dates mentioned

1953-03-31

Keywords

Entities

Extracted text (OCR)
= Ma A RNS ee an mene

Hi
BTANCARD FOMM™ Fo, £4 a 5 /
/

Office Memo anduin UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT
Vm _

1O | P. G,. Strenz) ye DATE: 31 March 1653 -
a >
Le nd

FROM

4
A

»
oO

s
9
7
a

i
ses

SUBJECT: Unidentified Flying Objects

1. ( Jack Hecker’ telerhonsed yesterday. and told: me that O/CI ssh
is no longer foll RS “recorts. of U. 0.'s, Jack {has the OI. YP. <

file of U, F.O. dispatches” sand wanted sug egestions ng as to where
to send ite. 7 ;
oo 2, -0/ST_interess | in Ve F, O.'s is ' currently centered on 0 gE
| Dave Stev epagn (alr eee Tiet Sefence Division).~ He is back- ~~" -
_ storped bx * Col. Frits ar_\Seorhys Pr /ee:e Diviston). “Stevenson a
ous tion of key documents, Fanel Reports,
ions Staff office. .

or O/SI to keep a watch on U. F. S
reater activity this “summers The 0 0 Ss.

ed to_assign responsibility and insure oS

3, -It vould seen wv
sorts “in view™ of SO88:
72

|
-

ise oy oy De

~
‘

i tee 7

$| Gt a4
[Mt
4

| HD
ck

*3
Go
Pen *
-
oO
a
w
Pp ¢
$
s
wt
‘2

aD ea HG!
lor

Vas ck
|
|

fierce Division as
swith the suggestion that
tien ran", Carbdon copy
+
Ne

7
te
oO

ane

o
aD,
wi
pve
OW

3 >
ry ty
ce
7

OO

tons YU division supsort to.
nated ty{Lt. Gol. S. CG, Cder.)

os UT 3
ov

CO. He 3
2

Sie

el we bi

hte.

SY turn files now in custody of nn Hecke rt}

on for perusal, I believe very little material A :
oceta a wor meh Sa aving excett as samples of indicative or ad
wrisual reports. - Thee rest I xecomnenc be destroyed.

Us

wo jor
3

Screening Fanelj(Iiss Lowry, )I believe)
azes pertaining to U. F. 0.'s to the
ion, ttention:[ D. 5. Steve TSON, ye

1. The acove methed is believed the sinplest method for o/st
effectively keeping tabs

mes on the subject. ‘here would be Little .
tine required on cievensen's ‘part to keep hinself up to date. Th
the event of a future flap, his continuing watch should prove.
valuable in a critical analysis Pyott ‘tine to time he misnt -

s
renort orally to you or to me on the status quo tut no rermal

Pee eae Se es

oe [ates ee

; aad
: ro P, G, Strenz | =“ > DATE: 31 Parch 1953
H — pe - . ra
; ~y/ a
FROM C. Durant g ;
SUBJECT: Unidentified Flying Objects
1. nel: Heckert jtelerhoned yester cay and tola me that 0/Cr
is no longer follo. = retorts of U. F,.0.'s. [dack]has the O/CI Z£- <2
file of U. F. 0, discatches and wanted sug gestion 6 as to where
, to send it,
~~ 2s 0/St_int teroct in tt. F, O.'s is currently centered on. ge
| Dave Stevenson (air Tranch/Apeliet-Solence Division). He ack ~~."
“ storped by{ Liw’Col, Frita C Cder {Georhys Py /v2:3 Division) .) Stevenson
as all C/SI files with exception of- ‘key: docw mentsy Fanel- Repo orts,;
etc. which are in the Operations Staff office
3. Tt would seen wise for 0/SI to keep a watch on a F.C,
renorts in_view of possibly greater_activity this sue The
following stecs are sugsested to assign responsidi lit ty and insure
receint of intelligerze information?
a, Desicnste Chief, Applied Selence Division as
-goordinator oF reports, on U, F. O,'s with the suggestion that
lr, David 5. Stevenson be nared Haction 1 ran", Carbon copy -
pao Chiara c would reg est di ivision ‘Sapsor’ 40, oo
or . a a
cone b. Request Ofer turn files now in custody of Zohn Heckert jf =
over tol Stevensen for-rerusal. Tt believe very little material 2 > -
would be worth: Y out as samples of indicative or as
unusual reports. The rest I recomend be destroyed. - .
ce. Request O/CI Screening Fanei((iiss Lowry, )I believe) — :
route all susie ees ees rertaining to U. F. 0,'s to-tne. a
Arolied Scien ce Division, Attention? | , B. Stevenson, for ao :
reviet. : —— = een
Le The above methed is believed the simplest method for 0/st - =--
effcctively keeping tabs onth ne subject. There would be Tittle :
- --tin2 requ ows sents ipart to lecp himself up to date. Ih :
the eve ur “his convinuing watch should prove.
valuable in a critical analysis, —¥Yren time to tine he might ~
report orally to you or to ne on the status quo but no rermal
rerorts i
‘

ee ee a ee Se


see meee

vw

Pwwns

5. If the above plan appears suitable end you so desire, I'12

prepare directive memos, :
“4 wo
° e a 7
Fe Gy DURALT-)
OST/durantion os
See .
Distribution: . _
Crig and 1 ~ Addressee + =n
1 = Subject file eo
1 = Chrono file.
l= Daily reading file”
.

Related files

Connected through the network