Profile: James Randi — "A Skeptically Inquiring Mind"
This file is a July 1995 Scientific American profile of James Randi (born Randall James Hamilton Zwinge), a former professional magician who became a leading investigator of pseudoscientific and paranormal claims. Written by Philip Yam and framed around a lengthy breakfast interview at a San Jose Holiday Inn, the piece describes Randi's methods for exposing trickery, his co-founding of the Committee for the Scientific Investigation of Claims of the Paranormal (CSICOP), and his frequent television appearances. It recounts his 1986 exposure of faith healer Reverend Peter Popoff via intercepted radio transmissions, his defamation litigation with spoon-bender Uri Geller (in which courts ordered Geller to pay $150,000 in sanctions, later settled), and his 1986 MacArthur fellowship. The article also notes his strained relationship with CSICOP, which he says forced him to resign over his continued statements about Geller. It references parapsychology figures such as Robert Jahn and Brenda Dunne of Princeton, Jacques Benveniste's water-memory claims, and cold-fusion figure Martin Fleischmann. The document survives in the CIA reading room, carrying declassification stamps and STAR GATE (remote viewing program) markings, and was approved for release on 2003/09/16.
Description
A Scientific American magazine profile of magician and professional skeptic James "The Amazing" Randi, preserved in the CIA's declassified reading room (bearing STAR GATE-era SG1I markings). The article recounts Randi's work debunking faith healers, psychics, dowsers, and parapsychology claims, including his exposure of Peter Popoff and his legal battles with Uri Geller.
Claims
Randi exposed faith healer Peter Popoff in 1986 by intercepting radio transmissions from Popoff's wife directing him through a concealed earphone.
95%Randi received a $272,000 MacArthur fellowship in 1986.
95%Courts ruled in favor of Randi and CSICOP in the Uri Geller litigation, ordering Geller to pay $150,000 in sanctions, later settled for a lesser amount in March 1995.
80%Courts ruled in favor of the skeptics in the Uri Geller lawsuit and ordered Geller to pay $150,000 in sanctions; CSICOP later settled for less.
80%Randi says CSICOP essentially forced him to resign over his continued statements about Geller.
80%Robert Jahn of Princeton found that people seem able to influence random-number-generator outcomes by thought; Randi questions replicability.
75%Randi was effectively forced to resign from CSICOP over his continued statements about Geller.
70%Physicist Robert Jahn of Princeton found that people appear able to influence random-number generator outcomes by thought alone.
55%Jacques Benveniste of the University of Paris-South claimed water could 'remember' molecular structures of antibodies.
55%
Events
Jun 30, 1995
Publication of Randi profile in Scientific American
Philip Yam's profile 'A Skeptically Inquiring Mind' appears in the July 1995 issue.
Dec 31, 1985
Randi exposes faith healer Peter Popoff
Randi intercepted and taped radio transmissions from Popoff's wife feeding him information, leading to a Tonight Show exposé and Popoff's bankruptcy.
Geller lawsuit ruling and sanctions
Courts ruled in favor of the skeptics and ordered Geller to pay $150,000 in sanctions; CSICOP announced a settlement in March 1995.
Sep 15, 2003
CIA approves document for release
Reading-room 'Approved For Release' stamp dated 2003/09/16.
Dec 31, 1985
Exposure of Peter Popoff
Randi intercepted radio transmissions revealing Popoff's wife fed him information via a concealed earphone; public exposure forced Popoff into bankruptcy.
Dec 31, 1985
Randi awarded MacArthur fellowship
Randi received a $272,000 MacArthur fellowship.
Feb 28, 1995
Geller lawsuit settlement
CSICOP announced it had settled with Uri Geller for somewhat less than the $150,000 in ordered sanctions.
Jun 30, 1995
Scientific American profile published
Publication of the Philip Yam profile of James Randi.
Sep 15, 2003
CIA approved for release
Document approved for release from CIA archives.
Dates mentioned
Keywords
Entities
Organizations
People
Programs
Extracted text (OCR)
Me PROFILE: JAMES RANDI bie 20310 6 : CIA-RDP96-00791RUGHS GUT eD AAS Bi crsity, d John F A Skeptically Inquiring ~ Approved For Relg ou communist pervert creep. Breakfast at the San Jose Holiday Inn restaurant has continued for more than three hours now, and it be- comes clear why such letter salutations are common for James “The Amazing” Randi. Despite a kindly appearance— he resembles a trimmer and shorter Santa Claus—sacks full of hate mail ar- rive at his door routinely. “Really vitri- olic stuff,” he comments, “and then they’re signed, ‘Yours in Christ.’” Threats of death only make him testy, though. He invited one such letter writ- er to a lecture and punched him in the mouth. “I don’t take crap from people. I did for a long time in my life. I’m not the nice little boy anymore.” The 66-year-old Randi is an expert on crap. “I lecture on bullshit,” he explains by way of indicating his main source of in- come. The former professional magician has become perhaps the world’s leading investigator of pseudoscientific and para- normal claims. His targets have included faith healers, psychics, dowsers and other charlatans. He has been drafted to explore homeopathic results and per- petual motion machines. Along the way he helped to found the Committee for the Scientific In- vestigation of Claims of the Paranormal (CSICOP), a skeptics organization based in Amherst, N.Y., which publishes the bi- monthly Skeptical Inquirer. Years of performing magic—he has accumulated innumerable television ap- pearances, including more than 30 on the Tonight Show—have equipped Ran- di with a useful skill: “I have a peculiar expertise that enables me to do two things very well. I know how people are deceived, and I know how people de- ceive themselves.” Unlike scientists, Randi points out, magicians are taught methods of trickery. Scientists think logically, but the swindler does not, and like a magician, “he gives you lots of very good evidence that’s false. A magi- cian doesn't say, ‘This is an empty box.’ He drops the box on the stage, and it sounds like an empty box.” Because Randi understands such mis- direction, he can devise countermea- sures. To expose a fellow who claimed to tun the pages of a telephone book 34 SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN July 1995 SG1I antibodies. Then there are Stamey rons Mind and Martin Fleischmann’s pronounce- cludes that some adolescents really were abducted by UFOs. by mind alone, Randi sprinkled bits of Styrofoam around the book, figuring that the trickster was actually flipping the pages by exhaling discreetly. A breath would disturb the Styrofoam. Sure enough, the man balked. “You can’t slip a trick by Randi,” observes Barry Karr, the executive director of CSICOP. Despite exposing charlatans, Randi does not hesitate to practice some flum- mery. In explaining the art of decep- tion, he is all too ready to bend a couple of spoons and to make sugar packets and crumpled paper napkins disappear. é THE AMAZING RANDI exposes all manner of pseudo- science and the paranormal. “Pd take that as proof of divinity my- self,” he deadpans and suggests I pock- et the damaged utensils, in case the du- tiful waiter who keeps hovering about notices. . Not that scientists should be taught magic tricks. “But what they should know,” Randi insists, “is that there are things beyond their expertise.” Too many academics think they are too smart to be fooled. “Physicists are most easily deceived, because they deal in a real world of objects,” Randi says, not- ing that their natural inclination is to take anomalies as discoveries rather than as hoaxes. Of course, scientists fall prey to self- delusion as readily as anyone else. Jacques Benveniste of the University of Paris-South claimed that water could “remember” the Molecular structure of - Approved For Release-2003/09/1& ~CtAcRBPVS 607 ST Some suspicious assertions, though, cannot be debunked easily. Physicist Robert Jahn of Princeton University has found that people seem to be able to in- fluence the outcomes of a random-num- ber generator by mere thought. Randi suggests that the key to this telekinetic claim may lie with Brenda Dunne, Jahn’s chief investigator, who is well known in the parapsychology field. “She's not very cooperative. She won't let people see the program or allow them to inter-~ fere with the protocol. I think it raises... certain doubts whether these experi- ments will ever be replicated,” Randi opines. “It is such a big experi- ment. Nobody in the skeptics field can afford to do it.” Such practical limits might only exacerbate the current re- surgence of belief in the para- normal. “The cornmunications media have made it available to everyone,” Randi observes. He cites a self-proclaimed psychic who calls himself “The Great Samaritan.” Advertising on Spanish-language television, he asks viewers to dial a 900 num- ber for psychic advice. With caller-identification technology and banks of networked com- puters at their disposal, opera- tors can obtain financial and health records, convincing their unsuspecting callers of their as- trological prowess. The economic cost of such exploitation is difficult to ascer- tain, but Randi believes it amounts to hundreds of mil- lions of doilars in faith healing alone. In rooting through nearby dumpsters after one such show, he found many $5 checks—apparently too small a sum to bother depositing, given the suitcases full of cash that had just been loaded into the limousine. So profitable is the field and so pow- erful is the allure of the paranormal that exposed psychics can easily set up shop again. A case in point is the faith healer Reverend Peter Popoff, whom Randi defrocked in 1986. Randi inter- cepted and taped radio transmissions from Popoff’s wife to her husband as he worked the audience and “read” their minds. His wife had previously inter- viewed these people and was directing her husband, who wore a concealed ear- phone. Obscenities, insults and jokes fill the tape. “A guy showed up with tes- BERND AUERS ~~ . ticifér cancer, and ne ARREQVED Bor Re IPaSR AOS LOPES: GARR Rae OB 79 ABRONADRLSGR 2 Sriudes. “You they're laughing at him,” Randi exclaims. After the California Attorney General’s Office declined to shut down the min- istry (citing the separation of church and state), Randi appealed to a higher authority: Johnny Carson. Public expo- sure of the tape eventually forced Pop- off into bankruptcy. “But now Popoff is back in business,” Randi laments. “There’s no continuing agency or law that will stop him from doing the same thing all over again.” A change in the name of the ministry and a new location are all that is needed. Many people reject scientific thinking because science deals with probabilities, not black-and-white answers. Randi finds that devotees of faith healers mostly watch soap operas and pro- fessional “wrestling” because those programs provide definitive out- comes. “You will be amused at your own expense if in the long run you don’t take them seriously,” he warns. “These are facts of life for very many people.” A case in point is his own brother. “He believes in cuckoo stuff,” Randi remarks of the sibling with whom he has largely lost touch. Randi developed his skepticism early in life. A child prodigy, Randall James Hamilton Zwinge was given permission at age 12 to study inde- pendently out of the classroom. He used the opportunity to his advan- tage, wandering the streets of his native Toronto and venturing into a theater where he witnessed magi- cian Harry Blackstone, Sr., levitating a woman. “I remember categorizing it,” Randi states. “Either it was some sort of misperception, or some sort of mechanical or physical trick.” Trips to the library and mentoring by Blackstone enabled Randi to de- velop his own conjuring abilities. Q § 9 2 c WwW o a small step. “They're both part of the same thing,” Randi says, Even so, his first investigation, at age 15, got mixed results. An evangelist at a local church was apparently answering sealed re- quests from his congregation by men- tally reading the contents. “He was do- ing the one-ahead method,” deduced Randi, who stormed to the pulpit and fished out the last opened envelope to show that the preacher was answering the previous question, not the one in the sealed envelope. For his troubles, he was roundly booed and escorted to the police station. “At that moment, I became determined that I was going to spend some time doing this. One of these days, they will listen,” Randi MAGIC AND DEBUNKING are essentially the have to be totally dedicated and be a little obsessed.” And being such an outspoken critic does have its drawbacks. He has been sued several times for allegedly defam- atory comments, the most notorious about spoon-bender Uri Geller. In an newspaper interview, Randi claimed that Geller’s abilities derived from the kinds of tricks printed on cereal boxes. Geller sued both Randi and CSICOP. “In my opinion, he was getting desperate for funds,” Randi remarks. “He thought he would always be able to make a liv- ing by bending spoons. A dumb profes- sion if I ever heard of it.” The courts ruled in favor of the skeptics and or- dered Geller to pay $150,000 in sanc- tions. This past March, CSICOP an- nounced that it had settled with Geller for somewhat less than that amount. The legal actiori, however, has had some negative impact. “These law- suits from psychics have wiped me out financially,” Randi complains. That includes the $272,000 MacAr- thur fellowship he received in 1986. The lawsuits have also made Randi more circumspect in his declara- tions. “I am being more careful about what I say,” he concedes. “I have a right to an opinion—it just depends on how it’s phrased.” Others seem equally cautious: CSICOP relies on prepared statements rather than any verbal comment. Perhaps more disconcerting for Randi are his sour feelings for CSI- COP. “They got wimpy on me,” Ran- di groans. “They essentially forced me to resign. They were afraid of my continuing to make statements about Geller.” The official policy of the organization is that individual members do not speak for the group. Those skills served him well. “I sare thing, notes Randi as he levitates some As a result, CSICOP’s insurance com- didn’t find much point in graduat- ing, because I had met several peo- ple ahead of me at the University of Toronto, and they didn’t seem to know how to think, how to originate materi- af,” Randi explains. “That was not my idea of an education.” Instead a 17-year- old Randi joined a traveling carnival, in part to overcome his acute shyness: “The most difficult thing to do,” he rea- soned, “would be to face an audience.” He became known as Prince Ibis, a mentalist who wore “a funny black tur- ban,” Randi recalls. “I just about died. It was a terrible experience, having to walk out in front of a really savage crowd.” “ Nevertheless, he stuck with it and soon graduated to the nightclub circuit, even- tually adopting his stage name and legally becoming James Randi. dice—at least momentarily. vowed. “And by golly, they are listening.” Debunking occupies most of Randi’s time. “Nature abhors a vacuum; Randi abhors free time,” he sums up. “I’ve got a busy life ahead and so many projects under way. The minute before I die, I want to be exceedingly annoyed over the fact that I've got a lot of unfinished projects. That's going to be a happy time for me.” For Randi, the rewards for a hectic schedule come in the appreciation he feels from young people, many of whom beat a path to his Florida home in the hopes of following in his foot-. steps. But the skeptic has not found any suitable protégés, “You have to be a little nuts to fly in the face of what is pany has been balking at recouping Randi’s losses, although he is cur- rently trying to recover some cash. Randi is unsure if he wants to rejoin CSICOP., “I never heard any kind of ad- mission that they had cut me adrift, de- serted me when I needed them.” Randi becomes somewhat philosophical. “Hey, T'm not complaining, believe me,” he says. “I consider CSICOP my baby. I’m happy it's in good hands, and I'll al- ways do anything for the committee to promote it.” It is almost noon. Feeling a bit guilty about the damaged flatware, I leave a larger than usual tip. I wonder what to say to airport security if the bent spoons set off the metal detector. “Do what I do,” Randi advises. “Tell them it’s a hobby.” —Philip Yam Approved For Release 2003/09/16 : CIA-RDP96-0ScfEROOAROATAHOARYIIS § 35
Related files
Connected through the network
SF-2026-001029
STAR GATE Project 94-275-0 (Phase VI) — Remote Viewing Data Summaries: Cali Cartel 727 Cocaine Flight
SF-2026-001030
Psychic Powers: What Are the Odds? — New Scientist Article on Robert Jahn's PEAR Micro-PK Research
SF-2026-001009
